Tag Archive for: passenger processing

IATA calls for standardised eVisa checks

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has called for greater standardisation in electronic visa verification as airlines struggle to authenticate a growing range of digital documents.

More than 100 countries now issue eVisas, but proof may arrive as an email, PDF or QR code. Verification can involve checking a government website, connecting to a national database or manually examining supporting documents.

“While travellers benefit from the simplicity of eVisa issuance, airlines suffer from the complexity of verification,” said Harry Grewal (pictured), IATA Director Airports, Infrastructure and Customer Experience, in an IATA opinion piece.

Airlines must confirm that international passengers hold the documents needed to enter their destination, including at any transit points. Accepting someone without the correct documentation can result in fines and removal costs averaging US$9,000, according to IATA.

The challenge is particularly acute for check-in agents, who must understand the entry requirements and verification methods used by countries worldwide.

“The solution lies in standardisation,” Grewal said.

IATA’s Control Authorities Working Group has published best-practice guidance for issuing and verifying non-physical travel authorisations, building on work by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

The guidance centres on two existing mechanisms. The first is interactive Advance Passenger Information (iAPI), which enables an airline to send passenger data electronically to the destination government during check-in. The government then provides an immediate response confirming whether the traveller meets the requirements for the journey.

According to IATA, airlines have reported documentation compliance rates up to 20 times higher in countries with comprehensive iAPI systems than in those relying on manual checks. However, fewer than 30 countries currently operate the technology.

The second mechanism is the ICAO Digital Travel Authorization (DTA). It provides standardised, digitally signed evidence that an electronic authorisation has been issued, giving airlines information in a consistent and verifiable format.

The two mechanisms could operate together. iAPI would allow airlines to check a passenger’s status directly with a government in real time, while a DTA could provide authenticated proof when an iAPI check is unavailable.

Grewal acknowledged that national security considerations mean universal adoption will take time. He nevertheless urged governments to align existing visa confirmations with international standards, integrate verification into airline check-in systems and consult carriers before introducing new programmes.

Adopting common standards would not affect governments’ authority to determine visa requirements or decide who may enter their territory, he added. However, verification must now catch up with the progress already made in digitising visa applications and approvals.

Image: LinkedIn/Harry Grewal

New biometric system removes airport border stops

SITA has launched a border processing system designed to verify pre-cleared passengers as they walk through immigration halls, removing the need for eligible travellers to stop at a passport desk, kiosk or eGate.

SITA Border Flow Lane uses information collected before departure to create a digital travel credential for enrolled travellers. Cameras installed along an arrivals corridor then match each passenger against that credential as they move through the airport.

“Travellers first enrol and confirm that they match the digital travel credential created during enrolment and pre-clearance ahead of travel,” Igor Oliveira, Head of Portfolio, Solutions & Innovation at SITA Borders, told Airports AI Alliance. “At the border, cameras positioned along the arrivals corridor match each traveller against the digital travel credential that was created in advance when they enrolled and were pre-cleared.”

Border authorities retain control over identity verification and clearance decisions, while officers can intervene at any point.

“This happens with no gate, document scan or device to interact with,” Oliveira said. “Behind the scenes, data analytics and automated decision support apply the border agency’s rules and flag anyone who requires further checks.”

SITA estimates that more than 75 percent of travellers could be cleared before departure and that the system could process passengers up to eight times faster than conventional eGates. However, these figures are modelled estimates based on testing and analysis rather than results from a live airport deployment.

A conventional border gate typically processes one traveller every 15–20 seconds. Border Flow Lane is designed to verify several eligible travellers continuously while they are moving, although its performance will depend on passenger volumes, the proportion cleared in advance and local operating conditions.

“The figure is realistic and modelled operational outcomes that reflect the performance potential of SITA Border Flow Lane’s operating model, as identified in our testing and analysis, not results from a live deployment,” Oliveira said.

“Border Flow Lane isn’t promising that every airport will instantly operate at eight times throughput. The point is that the operating model removes many of the constraints created by traditional stop-and-process interactions.”

The system has been introduced as a co-innovation initiative and is installed in SITA’s innovation laboratories and testing facilities. The company is engaging with governments and border agencies interested in piloting and refining it in operational environments but has not announced the location or timing of its first live passenger deployment.

For airports, reducing the number of passengers required to stop could increase the capacity of existing immigration halls without physical expansion. It could also enable border officers to focus more attention on passengers requiring closer examination.

Enrolment will be voluntary. Travellers will be checked only against the credential created during their enrolment and pre-clearance, rather than a wider population database. Border agencies will determine eligibility, data requirements and how information is handled under applicable laws and policies.

“Travellers who choose not to enrol or cannot use biometric processing continue through the border agency’s existing assisted or officer-led process,” Oliveira said. “Each deployment will include accessibility and human-support options appropriate to the airport and its travellers.”

Image: Dechev | Dreamstime.com